Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Wizardlm 13b
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 46.0 to 30.5.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.58 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.68 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |
Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1048 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |
Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Wizardlm 13b?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Wizardlm 13b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.