Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs phi-3-medium 14B
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 39.9 to 36.3.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 29.1 |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.58 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.68 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 39.9 (#136), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.1 (#65), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.1 (#217), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than phi-3-medium 14B?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.