Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale DeepSeek

39.7

Rank #162 Reported

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark leads 66.0 to 46.0.
  • DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Muse Spark specifications
DeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMuse Spark
ProviderDeepSeekMeta
Noometry Index39.750.6
Released2025-12-012026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.58—
Output $ / M tokens$1.68—
Results tracked327

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMuse Spark
SciCode—51.5%
WeirdML46.7%—
LMArena Coding—1481

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMuse Spark
SimpleBench52.6%—
CritPt—11.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1474
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMuse Spark
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
LMArena Math—1455
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMuse Spark
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%
LMArena Expert—1457

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMuse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English—1464
LMArena Chinese—1509
LMArena French—1497
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Korean—1459
LMArena Russian—1466
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following—1442

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query—1451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMuse Spark
LMArena Text—1474
LMArena Creative Writing—1459
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1276—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1477

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Muse Spark share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper