Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Mistral Small 3.1

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.1 costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale DeepSeek

39.1

Rank #159 Reported

Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI

31.4

Rank #263 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Small 3.1 in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.1 to 18.9.
  • Mistral Small 3.1 is cheaper at $0.35 / $0.56 per million input/output tokens, against $0.58 / $1.68 for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Mistral Small 3.1 specifications
DeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMistral Small 3.1
ProviderDeepSeekMistral AI
Noometry Index39.131.4
Released2025-12-012025-03-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K128K
Max output128K102K
Input $ / M tokens$0.58$0.35
Output $ / M tokens$1.68$0.56
Results tracked328

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 39.9 (#136), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.7 (#175)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMistral Small 3.1
WeirdML46.7%—
LMArena Coding—1309

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.1 (#65), Mistral Small 3.1: 18.9 (#249)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMistral Small 3.1
SimpleBench52.6%—
Chess Puzzles—1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1278
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.48

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 13.7 (#295)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMistral Small 3.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—3.9%
Omni-MATH—24.8%
LMArena Math—1261

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#266)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMistral Small 3.1
GPQA Diamond—41.9%
MMLU-Pro—61%
GPQA (HELM)—39.2%
LMArena Expert—1258

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 32.6 (#93)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Vision—1136

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 41.4 (#204)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Non-English—1255
LMArena Chinese—1254
LMArena French—1270
LMArena German—1266
LMArena Japanese—1210
LMArena Korean—1206
LMArena Russian—1263
LMArena Spanish—1283

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 63.8 (#225)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMistral Small 3.1
IFEval—75%
LMArena Instruction Following—1264

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#172)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Longer Query—1300

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.1 (#217), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.2 (#254)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMistral Small 3.1
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1276761
LMArena Text—1278
LMArena Creative Writing—1253
WildBench—78.8%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1270

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Mistral Small 3.1?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.1 costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Mistral Small 3.1?

Mistral Small 3.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $0.56 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale lists at $0.58 and $1.68.

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 128K tokens.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Mistral Small 3.1 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper