Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Mistral Small 3.1
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.1 costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Small 3.1 in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.1 to 18.9.
- Mistral Small 3.1 is cheaper at $0.35 / $0.56 per million input/output tokens, against $0.58 / $1.68 for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | 2025-03-17 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
| Max output | 128K | 102K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.58 | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.68 | $0.56 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 28 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 39.9 (#136), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.7 (#175)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1309 |
Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.1 (#65), Mistral Small 3.1: 18.9 (#249)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1278 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 127.48 |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 13.7 (#295)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 3.9% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 24.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1261 |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#266)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 61% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 39.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1258 |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 32.6 (#93)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1136 |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 41.4 (#204)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1270 |
| LMArena German | — | 1266 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1210 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1283 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 63.8 (#225)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 75% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1264 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#172)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1300 |
Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.1 (#217), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.2 (#254)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | 761 |
| LMArena Text | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1253 |
| WildBench | — | 78.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1270 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Mistral Small 3.1?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.1 costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Mistral Small 3.1?
Mistral Small 3.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $0.56 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale lists at $0.58 and $1.68.
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 128K tokens.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Mistral Small 3.1 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.