Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Mistral Small 3
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3 costs 15× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Small 3 in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.9 to 18.9.
- Mistral Small 3 is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.58 / $1.68 for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 33K.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | 2025-01-30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 33K |
| Max output | 128K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.58 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.68 | $0.08 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140), Mistral Small 3: 36.5 (#207)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1246 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 50.4% |
Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73), Mistral Small 3: 18.9 (#273)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1233 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 127.07 |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mistral Small 3: 16.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.7% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1240 |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mistral Small 3: 25.1 (#263)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 47.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 25.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1202 |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mistral Small 3: 37.3 (#236)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1198 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1204 |
| LMArena French | — | 1203 |
| LMArena German | — | 1211 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1188 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1216 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mistral Small 3: 63.7 (#229)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1214 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#211)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1246 |
Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222), Mistral Small 3: 32.2 (#280)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | 707 |
| LMArena Text | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1195 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1217 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Mistral Small 3?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3 costs 15× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Mistral Small 3?
Mistral Small 3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale lists at $0.58 and $1.68.
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Mistral Small 3 better for coding?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale does, with 128K tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Mistral Small 3 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3 has 24.