Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale DeepSeek

39.1

Rank #159 Reported

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

44.8

Rank #70 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.5 to 46.1.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.58 / $1.68 for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifications
DeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderDeepSeekXiaomi
Noometry Index39.144.8
Released2025-12-012026-04-22
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K1.05M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.58$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$1.68$0.87
Results tracked327

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 39.9 (#136), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena WebDev—1477
SciCode—50.2%
WeirdML46.7%—
LMArena Coding—1502
ALE-Bench—899.8

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.1 (#65), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMiMo-V2.5-Pro
SimpleBench52.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)—34.4%
CritPt—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1487
DTBench—84.5%
LMCA—29.5%

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProofBench—22%
LMArena Math—1480

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Expert—1501

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Non-English—1449
LMArena Chinese—1507
LMArena French—1489
LMArena German—1455
LMArena Japanese—1418
LMArena Korean—1436
LMArena Russian—1450
LMArena Spanish—1470

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following—1477

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Longer Query—1482

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.1 (#217), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMiMo-V2.5-Pro
EQ-Bench Creative Writing12761493
LMArena Text—1465
LMArena Creative Writing—1440
EQ-Bench 4—1208
LMArena Multi-Turn—1477

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale lists at $0.58 and $1.68.

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper