Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Mercury

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale DeepSeek

39.7

Rank #162 Reported

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.9 to 17.5.
  • DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Mercury specifications
DeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMercury
ProviderDeepSeekInception
Noometry Index39.737.6
Released2025-12-01—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.58—
Output $ / M tokens$1.68—
Results tracked39

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140), Mercury: 38.7 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMercury
WeirdML46.7%—
LMArena Coding—1322

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73), Mercury: 17.5 (#293)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMercury
SimpleBench52.6%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—21.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1285

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mercury: 41.6 (#206)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMercury
LMArena Non-English—1260

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mercury: 65.2 (#224)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMercury
LMArena Instruction Following—1239

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mercury: 38.4 (#198)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMercury
LMArena Longer Query—1266

Writing & Preference Too close to call

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222), Mercury: 46.2 (#221)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMercury
LMArena Text—1282
LMArena Creative Writing—1191
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1276—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1282

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Mercury?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Mercury better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Mercury share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper