Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 46.0.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.58 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.68 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1418 |
Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1416 |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1382 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1397 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1404 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1388 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1422 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.