Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 46.0.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.58 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.68 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1361 |
Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1374 |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1359 |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1339 |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1417 |
| LMArena French | — | 1391 |
| LMArena German | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1368 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1344 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1366 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1359 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1387 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.4 vs 40.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.