Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Grok 4 Fast

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Grok 4 Fast score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 39.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale DeepSeek

39.1

Rank #159 Reported

Grok 4 Fast xAI

39.0

Rank #164 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher in 2 categories and Grok 4 Fast in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4 Fast leads 60.2 to 46.1.
  • DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Grok 4 Fast specifications
DeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok 4 Fast
ProviderDeepSeekxAI
Noometry Index39.139.0
Released2025-12-012025-09-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.58—
Output $ / M tokens$1.68—
Results tracked330

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 39.9 (#136), Grok 4 Fast: 32.3 (#264)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok 4 Fast
WeirdML46.7%42.9%
LMArena WebDev—1160
LMArena Coding—1429

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Grok 4 Fast: 29.3 (#80)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok 4 Fast
τ²-bench Banking—15.7%
Cybench—30%
LMArena Search—1171

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.1 (#65), Grok 4 Fast: 22.5 (#179)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok 4 Fast
ARC-AGI-2—5.3%
SimpleBench52.6%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.1%
ARC-AGI-1—48.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1413
DTBench—82.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—144.21
ForecastBench—60.5

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Grok 4 Fast: 36.1 (#126)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Math—1419

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Grok 4 Fast: 31.5 (#211)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok 4 Fast
Vectara Hallucination Rate—19.7%
LMArena Expert—1411

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Grok 4 Fast: 51.5 (#106)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Non-English—1397
LMArena Chinese—1458
LMArena French—1433
LMArena German—1383
LMArena Japanese—1358
LMArena Korean—1359
LMArena Russian—1387
LMArena Spanish—1414

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Grok 4 Fast: 73.4 (#116)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Instruction Following—1388

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok 4 Fast
Fiction.LiveBench—94.4%
LMArena Longer Query—1415

Writing & Preference Grok 4 Fast leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.1 (#217), Grok 4 Fast: 60.2 (#96)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Text—1407
LMArena Creative Writing—1388
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1276—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1414

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Grok 4 Fast?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Grok 4 Fast score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 39.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Grok 4 Fast better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Grok 4 Fast share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 Fast has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper