Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs GPT-6 Sol
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale costs 4.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6 Sol in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-6 Sol leads 72.3 to 46.1.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is cheaper at $0.58 / $1.68 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6 Sol.
- GPT-6 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | GPT-6 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 49.2 |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.58 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.68 | $10 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Sol leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 39.9 (#136), GPT-6 Sol: 59.6 (#11)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 68.8% |
| FrontierCode | — | 49.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1692 |
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1453 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, GPT-6 Sol: 33.5 (#49)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 28% |
Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.1 (#65), GPT-6 Sol: 49.3 (#34)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 90.1% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 53.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1420 |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, GPT-6 Sol: 35.8 (#135)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1404 |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, GPT-6 Sol: 43.0 (#87)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#9)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 58.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, GPT-6 Sol: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1377 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, GPT-6 Sol: 74.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1406 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, GPT-6 Sol: 43.2 (#100)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1415 |
Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.1 (#217), GPT-6 Sol: 72.3 (#15)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | 2125 |
| LMArena Text | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1405 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than GPT-6 Sol?
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale costs 4.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or GPT-6 Sol?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is cheaper. It lists at $0.58 per million input tokens and $1.68 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Sol lists at $2 and $10.
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or GPT-6 Sol better for coding?
GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-6 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and GPT-6 Sol share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Sol has 22.