Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs Molmo 2 8b

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp DeepSeek

44.3

Rank #78 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp scores higher in 3 categories and Molmo 2 8b in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads 62.4 to 49.4.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and Molmo 2 8b specifications
DeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMolmo 2 8b
ProviderDeepSeekAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index44.339.1
Released2025-09-29—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window164K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.26—
Output $ / M tokens$0.38—
Results tracked495

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 46.5 (#65), Molmo 2 8b: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMolmo 2 8b
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)70%—
Aider Polyglot74.2%—
LMArena WebDev1362—
SWE-bench Multilingual59%—
SciCode38.9%—
WeirdML39.5%—
LMArena Coding1454—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 32.7 (#59), Molmo 2 8b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMolmo 2 8b
Terminal-Bench39.6%—
APEX-Agents21.3%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard56.7%—
TheAgentCompany42.9%—
Vending-Bench 21,034—

Reasoning Molmo 2 8b leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 22.1 (#208), Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Hard Prompts14341287
ARC-AGI-24%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)36.7%—
ARC-AGI-157%—
CritPt2.9%—
Chess Puzzles14%—
Thematic Generalization65%—
DTBench87.7%—
LMCA29.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.27—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 41.7 (#87), Molmo 2 8b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMolmo 2 8b
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions57.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202587.8%—
ProofBench8%—
LMArena Math1435—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)22.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 51.7 (#66), Molmo 2 8b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMolmo 2 8b
GPQA Diamond83.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.3%—
LMArena Expert1436—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: —, Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Vision—1081

Multilingual DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 52.2 (#90), Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Non-English14091276
LMArena Chinese1461—
LMArena French1433—
LMArena German1440—
LMArena Japanese1374—
LMArena Korean1371—
LMArena Russian1424—
LMArena Spanish1440—

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 74.5 (#93), Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Instruction Following14131270

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 47.6 (#16), Molmo 2 8b: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMolmo 2 8b
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%—
CL-bench13.2%—
CL-bench Life9.5%—
LMArena Longer Query1428—

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 62.4 (#77), Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMolmo 2 8b
LMArena Text14251288
LMArena Creative Writing1403—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1515—
LMArena Multi-Turn1427—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp better than Molmo 2 8b?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.3 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and Molmo 2 8b share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has 49 scored results on Noometry and Molmo 2 8b has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper