Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs Ministral 8B

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.3 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp DeepSeek

44.3

Rank #78 Confirmed

Ministral 8B Mistral AI

28.2

Rank #325 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp scores higher in 9 categories and Ministral 8B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads 51.7 to 12.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 83.4% for DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and 27.1% for Ministral 8B.
  • Ministral 8B is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.26 / $0.38 for DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp.
  • Ministral 8B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 164K.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and Ministral 8B specifications
DeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 8B
ProviderDeepSeekMistral AI
Noometry Index44.328.2
Released2025-09-292024-10-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window164K262K
Max output66K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.26$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$0.38$0.15
Results tracked4917

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 46.5 (#65), Ministral 8B: 35.0 (#230)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 8B
LMArena Coding14541202
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)70%—
Aider Polyglot74.2%—
LMArena WebDev1362—
SWE-bench Multilingual59%—
SciCode38.9%—
WeirdML39.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 32.7 (#59), Ministral 8B: 16.4 (#148)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard56.7%11.1%
Terminal-Bench39.6%—
APEX-Agents21.3%—
TheAgentCompany42.9%—
Vending-Bench 21,034—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 22.1 (#208), Ministral 8B: 18.4 (#281)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 8B
LMArena Hard Prompts14341191
DTBench87.7%45.7%
ARC-AGI-24%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)36.7%—
ARC-AGI-157%—
CritPt2.9%—
Chess Puzzles14%—
Thematic Generalization65%—
LMCA29.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.27—

Math DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 41.7 (#87), Ministral 8B: 25.7 (#267)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 8B
LMArena Math14351188
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions57.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202587.8%—
ProofBench8%—
MATH Level 5—14.9%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)22.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 51.7 (#66), Ministral 8B: 12.6 (#297)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 8B
GPQA Diamond83.4%27.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.3%7.4%
LMArena Expert14361170

Multilingual DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 52.2 (#90), Ministral 8B: 35.1 (#247)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 8B
LMArena Non-English14091165
LMArena Chinese14611193
LMArena Russian14241195
LMArena French1433—
LMArena German1440—
LMArena Japanese1374—
LMArena Korean1371—
LMArena Spanish1440—

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 74.5 (#93), Ministral 8B: 60.5 (#250)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 8B
LMArena Instruction Following14131161

Long Context DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 47.6 (#16), Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#227)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 8B
LMArena Longer Query14281212
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%—
CL-bench13.2%—
CL-bench Life9.5%—

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 62.4 (#77), Ministral 8B: 39.6 (#246)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 8B
LMArena Text14251191
LMArena Creative Writing14031175
LMArena Multi-Turn14271166
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1515—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp better than Ministral 8B?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.3 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp or Ministral 8B?

Ministral 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp lists at $0.26 and $0.38.

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp or Ministral 8B better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.5 versus 35.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 8B does, with 262K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and Ministral 8B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has 49 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 8B has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper