Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs Ministral 3B

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 25.6 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 7.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp DeepSeek

44.9

Rank #68 Confirmed

Ministral 3B Mistral AI

25.6

Rank #336 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp scores higher in 3 categories and Ministral 3B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads 51.6 to 10.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 83.4% for DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and 25.3% for Ministral 3B.
  • Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.04 per million input/output tokens, against $0.26 / $0.38 for DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp.
  • DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp accepts more context: 164K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and Ministral 3B specifications
DeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 3B
ProviderDeepSeekMistral AI
Noometry Index44.925.6
Released2025-09-292024-10-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window164K128K
Max output66K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.26$0.04
Output $ / M tokens$0.38$0.04
Results tracked486

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 46.4 (#61), Ministral 3B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 3B
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)70%—
Aider Polyglot74.2%—
LMArena WebDev1362—
SWE-bench Multilingual59%—
SciCode38.9%—
WeirdML39.5%—
LMArena Coding1454—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 37.9 (#31), Ministral 3B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 3B
Terminal-Bench39.6%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard56.7%—
TheAgentCompany42.9%—
Vending-Bench 21,034—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 22.0 (#185), Ministral 3B: 17.7 (#278)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 3B
DTBench87.7%51.7%
LMCA29.1%5.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index146.28118.08
ARC-AGI-24%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)36.7%—
ARC-AGI-157%—
CritPt2.9%—
Chess Puzzles14%—
Thematic Generalization65%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1433—

Math DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 40.8 (#75), Ministral 3B: 24.5 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 3B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions57.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202587.8%—
ProofBench8%—
LMArena Math1435—
MATH Level 5—14.4%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)22.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 51.6 (#61), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#297)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 3B
GPQA Diamond83.4%25.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.3%7.3%
LMArena Expert1436—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 52.4 (#85), Ministral 3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 3B
LMArena Non-English1409—
LMArena Chinese1461—
LMArena French1435—
LMArena German1440—
LMArena Japanese1377—
LMArena Korean1372—
LMArena Russian1423—
LMArena Spanish1441—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 74.7 (#89), Ministral 3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 3B
LMArena Instruction Following1413—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 47.6 (#15), Ministral 3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 3B
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%—
CL-bench13.2%—
CL-bench Life9.5%—
LMArena Longer Query1428—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 62.5 (#73), Ministral 3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpMinistral 3B
LMArena Text1425—
LMArena Creative Writing1403—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1515—
LMArena Multi-Turn1427—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp better than Ministral 3B?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 25.6 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 7.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp or Ministral 3B?

Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.04 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp lists at $0.26 and $0.38.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp does, with 164K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and Ministral 3B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has 48 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper