Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs Ministral 3B
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 25.6 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 7.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp scores higher in 3 categories and Ministral 3B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads 51.6 to 10.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 83.4% for DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and 25.3% for Ministral 3B.
- Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.04 per million input/output tokens, against $0.26 / $0.38 for DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp accepts more context: 164K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Ministral 3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 44.9 | 25.6 |
| Released | 2025-09-29 | 2024-10-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 164K | 128K |
| Max output | 66K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.26 | $0.04 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.38 | $0.04 |
| Results tracked | 48 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 46.4 (#61), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 70% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 74.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1362 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 59% | — |
| SciCode | 38.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 39.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 37.9 (#31), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 39.6% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 56.7% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 42.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 1,034 | — |
Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 22.0 (#185), Ministral 3B: 17.7 (#278)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 87.7% | 51.7% |
| LMCA | 29.1% | 5.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.28 | 118.08 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 52.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 36.7% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 57% | — |
| CritPt | 2.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 14% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 65% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1433 | — |
Math DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 40.8 (#75), Ministral 3B: 24.5 (#257)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 57.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 87.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1435 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 14.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 22.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 51.6 (#61), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#297)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.4% | 25.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.3% | 7.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1436 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 52.4 (#85), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1409 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | — |
| LMArena French | 1435 | — |
| LMArena German | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1441 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 74.7 (#89), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 47.6 (#15), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
| CL-bench | 13.2% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 9.5% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 62.5 (#73), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1403 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1515 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp better than Ministral 3B?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 25.6 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 7.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp or Ministral 3B?
Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.04 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp lists at $0.26 and $0.38.
Which has the bigger context window?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp does, with 164K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and Ministral 3B share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has 48 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.