Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs Devstral Small 2505

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.3 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Devstral Small 2505 costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp DeepSeek

44.3

Rank #78 Confirmed

Devstral Small 2505 Mistral AI

34.3

Rank #233 Reported

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp scores higher in 2 categories and Devstral Small 2505 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads 46.5 to 38.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 52.2% for DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and 37.7% for Devstral Small 2505.
  • Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.26 / $0.38 for DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp.
  • DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp accepts more context: 164K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and Devstral Small 2505 specifications
DeepSeek-V3.2-ExpDevstral Small 2505
ProviderDeepSeekMistral AI
Noometry Index44.334.3
Released2025-09-292025-05-07
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window164K128K
Max output66K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.26$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$0.38$0.30
Results tracked494

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 46.5 (#65), Devstral Small 2505: 38.9 (#166)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpDevstral Small 2505
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)70%56.4%
SciCode38.9%28.8%
Aider Polyglot74.2%—
LMArena WebDev1362—
SWE-bench Multilingual59%—
WeirdML39.5%—
LMArena Coding1454—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 32.7 (#59), Devstral Small 2505: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpDevstral Small 2505
Terminal-Bench39.6%—
APEX-Agents21.3%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard56.7%—
TheAgentCompany42.9%—
Vending-Bench 21,034—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 22.1 (#208), Devstral Small 2505: 19.7 (#252)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpDevstral Small 2505
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%37.7%
CritPt2.9%0%
ARC-AGI-24%—
NYT Connections (extended)36.7%—
ARC-AGI-157%—
Chess Puzzles14%—
Thematic Generalization65%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1434—
DTBench87.7%—
LMCA29.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.27—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 41.7 (#87), Devstral Small 2505: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpDevstral Small 2505
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions57.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202587.8%—
ProofBench8%—
LMArena Math1435—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)22.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 51.7 (#66), Devstral Small 2505: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpDevstral Small 2505
GPQA Diamond83.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.3%—
LMArena Expert1436—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 52.2 (#90), Devstral Small 2505: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpDevstral Small 2505
LMArena Non-English1409—
LMArena Chinese1461—
LMArena French1433—
LMArena German1440—
LMArena Japanese1374—
LMArena Korean1371—
LMArena Russian1424—
LMArena Spanish1440—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 74.5 (#93), Devstral Small 2505: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpDevstral Small 2505
LMArena Instruction Following1413—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 47.6 (#16), Devstral Small 2505: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpDevstral Small 2505
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%—
CL-bench13.2%—
CL-bench Life9.5%—
LMArena Longer Query1428—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 62.4 (#77), Devstral Small 2505: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpDevstral Small 2505
LMArena Text1425—
LMArena Creative Writing1403—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1515—
LMArena Multi-Turn1427—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp better than Devstral Small 2505?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.3 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Devstral Small 2505 costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp or Devstral Small 2505?

Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp lists at $0.26 and $0.38.

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp or Devstral Small 2505 better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.5 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp does, with 164K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and Devstral Small 2505 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has 49 scored results on Noometry and Devstral Small 2505 has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper