Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1 DeepSeek

42.8

Rank #108 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V3.1 leads 60.3 to 27.6.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.1 and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
DeepSeek-V3.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekMicrosoft
Noometry Index42.827.9
Released2025-08-212024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window164K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.25—
Output $ / M tokens$0.95—
Results tracked2735

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 40.3 (#144), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding14171093
WeirdML38.4%—
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 27.9 (#110), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14171072
SimpleBench40%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
DTBench82.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
LMCA24.3%—
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index139.92—
ForecastBench58—
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 38.9 (#122), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math14201111
LiveBench Math—15.7%

Knowledge DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 43.7 (#90), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert14051045
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.5%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 51.6 (#106), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14001021
LMArena Chinese14691021
LMArena French14471076
LMArena German14111044
LMArena Japanese1378935
LMArena Korean1337905
LMArena Russian14051022
LMArena Spanish14311085

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 73.9 (#110), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14001053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 36.3 (#232), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14221044
Fiction.LiveBench52.8%—

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 60.3 (#98), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text14201073
LMArena Creative Writing14011037
LMArena Multi-Turn14081018
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1436—
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.1 better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1 or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.3 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1 and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1 has 27 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper