Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1 DeepSeek

42.2

Rank #106 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V3.1 leads 60.5 to 42.9.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.1 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
DeepSeek-V3.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekNVIDIA
Noometry Index42.235.3
Released2025-08-212024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window164K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.25—
Output $ / M tokens$0.95—
Results tracked2717

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 39.8 (#140), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding14171209
WeirdML38.4%—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 27.3 (#109), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14171202
SimpleBench40%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%—
DTBench82.7%—
LMCA24.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index139.92—
ForecastBench58—

Math DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 36.1 (#125), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math14201216

Knowledge DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 43.0 (#86), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert14031171
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.5%—

Multilingual DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 51.8 (#100), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14001206
LMArena Chinese14701214
LMArena French14471196
LMArena German14121192
LMArena Japanese13741128
LMArena Korean13371148
LMArena Russian14051219
LMArena Spanish14291195

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 74.1 (#105), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14001203

Long Context Too close to call

DeepSeek-V3.1: 36.3 (#227), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14221225
Fiction.LiveBench52.8%—

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.1 leads

DeepSeek-V3.1: 60.5 (#93), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text14201225
LMArena Creative Writing14011203
LMArena Multi-Turn14081214
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1436—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.1 better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1 or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.8 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1 has 27 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper