Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Devstral Small 2505
DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Devstral Small 2505 costs 2.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Devstral Small 2505 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.1 leads 27.9 to 19.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 53.2% for DeepSeek-V3.1 and 37.7% for Devstral Small 2505.
- Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $0.95 for DeepSeek-V3.1.
- DeepSeek-V3.1 accepts more context: 164K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.1 | Devstral Small 2505 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2025-08-21 | 2025-05-07 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 164K | 128K |
| Max output | 8K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.95 | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek-V3.1 leads
DeepSeek-V3.1: 40.3 (#144), Devstral Small 2505: 38.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1 | Devstral Small 2505 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 56.4% |
| SciCode | — | 28.8% |
| WeirdML | 38.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1417 | — |
Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.1 leads
DeepSeek-V3.1: 27.9 (#110), Devstral Small 2505: 19.7 (#252)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1 | Devstral Small 2505 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 53.2% | 37.7% |
| SimpleBench | 40% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1417 | — |
| DTBench | 82.7% | — |
| LMCA | 24.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 139.92 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58 | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.1: 38.9 (#122), Devstral Small 2505: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1 | Devstral Small 2505 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1420 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.1: 43.7 (#90), Devstral Small 2505: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1 | Devstral Small 2505 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1405 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.1: 51.6 (#106), Devstral Small 2505: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1 | Devstral Small 2505 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | — |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1431 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.1: 73.9 (#110), Devstral Small 2505: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1 | Devstral Small 2505 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.1: 36.3 (#232), Devstral Small 2505: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1 | Devstral Small 2505 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 52.8% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.1: 60.3 (#98), Devstral Small 2505: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1 | Devstral Small 2505 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1408 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.1 better than Devstral Small 2505?
DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Devstral Small 2505 costs 2.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.1 or Devstral Small 2505?
Devstral Small 2505 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.1 lists at $0.25 and $0.95.
Is DeepSeek-V3.1 or Devstral Small 2505 better for coding?
DeepSeek-V3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.3 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
DeepSeek-V3.1 does, with 164K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1 and Devstral Small 2505 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1 has 27 scored results on Noometry and Devstral Small 2505 has 4.