Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher in 7 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads 38.5 to 14.2.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
DeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderDeepSeekAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index43.133.0
Released2025-09-222024-11-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window164K—
Max output147K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.27—
Output $ / M tokens$1—
Results tracked1614

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 42.0 (#113), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding14261235
SciCode40.6%—
ALE-Bench745.17—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 26.4 (#133), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts14261220
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.4%—
CritPt1.7%—
DTBench81.3%—
LMCA28.6%—

Math DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 38.5 (#137), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Math14021242
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.4%
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond—46.3%

Multilingual DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.1 (#92), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English14071236
LMArena Russian14361246
LMArena Chinese—1249

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.0 (#106), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following14041233

Long Context DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.4 (#97), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query14211224

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.0 (#92), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text14191256
LMArena Creative Writing14031231
LMArena Multi-Turn14111252

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.0 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper