Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus DeepSeek

43.1

Rank #97 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher in 7 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads 61.0 to 42.7.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
DeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekNVIDIA
Noometry Index43.135.9
Released2025-09-222024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window164K—
Max output147K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.27—
Output $ / M tokens$1—
Results tracked1617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 42.0 (#113), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding14261209
SciCode40.6%—
ALE-Bench745.17—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 26.4 (#133), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14261202
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.4%—
CritPt1.7%—
DTBench81.3%—
LMCA28.6%—

Math DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 38.5 (#137), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math14021216

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert—1171

Multilingual DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.1 (#92), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14071206
LMArena Russian14361219
LMArena Chinese—1214
LMArena French—1197
LMArena German—1192
LMArena Japanese—1128
LMArena Korean—1148
LMArena Spanish—1195

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.0 (#106), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14041203

Long Context DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.4 (#97), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14211225

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.0 (#92), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text14191225
LMArena Creative Writing14031203
LMArena Multi-Turn14111214

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.0 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper