Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus vs Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 4 Argon in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 38.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 1.7% for DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and 27.1% for Gemini 4 Argon.
- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemini 4 Argon | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 56.5 |
| Released | 2025-09-22 | 2026-09-30 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 164K | — |
| Max output | 147K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.27 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1 | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 42.0 (#113), Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 40.6% | 61.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1426 | 1550 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1678 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 55% |
| ALE-Bench | 745.17 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 82.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 13,718 |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 26.4 (#133), Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 1.7% | 27.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1426 | 1548 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.4% | — |
| DTBench | 81.3% | — |
| LMCA | 28.6% | — |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 38.5 (#137), Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1402 | 1536 |
| ProofBench | — | 99% |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1553 |
Multimodal Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 54.4% |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.1 (#92), Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1407 | 1523 |
| LMArena Russian | 1436 | 1537 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1610 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1497 |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.0 (#106), Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1538 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.4 (#97), Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1421 | 1549 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.0 (#92), Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1534 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1403 | 1531 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1411 | 1557 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better than Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Gemini 4 Argon better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 42.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Gemini 4 Argon share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 4 Argon has 21.