Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview

Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus costs 2.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3 Flash Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus DeepSeek

43.1

Rank #97 Confirmed

Gemini 3 Flash Preview Google

52.3

Rank #40 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3 Flash Preview in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads 49.2 to 26.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 28.6% for DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and 43.1% for Gemini 3 Flash Preview.
  • DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is cheaper at $0.27 / $1 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview.
  • Gemini 3 Flash Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 164K.
  • DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Gemini 3 Flash Preview specifications
DeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemini 3 Flash Preview
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Noometry Index43.152.3
Released2025-09-222025-12-17
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window164K1.05M
Max output147K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.27$0.50
Output $ / M tokens$1$3
Results tracked1659

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 42.0 (#113), Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 50.9 (#42)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemini 3 Flash Preview
LMArena Coding14261460
ALE-Bench745.171,367
SWE-bench Verified—75.4%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—75.8%
LMArena WebDev—1439
SWE-bench Multilingual—72.7%
SciCode40.6%—
GSO—9.8%
WeirdML—61.6%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 38.7 (#29)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemini 3 Flash Preview
Terminal-Bench—64.3%
τ²-bench Airline—82.5%
τ²-bench Banking—27.3%
τ²-bench Retail—76.8%
τ²-bench Telecom—91.2%
DeepResearch Bench—49.8%
BALROG—48.1%
GDP.pdf—10%
LMArena Search—1198
Vending-Bench 2—3,635

Reasoning Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 26.4 (#133), Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 49.2 (#37)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemini 3 Flash Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts14261465
DTBench81.3%89.1%
LMCA28.6%43.1%
ARC-AGI-2—33.6%
SimpleBench—61.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)—83.1%
ARC-AGI-1—84.7%
CritPt1.7%—
Chess Puzzles—40%
Mystery Game Puzzles—26%
Epoch Capabilities Index—151.8
ForecastBench—58.5

Math Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 38.5 (#137), Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.7 (#55)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemini 3 Flash Preview
LMArena Math14021473
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—51.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—67.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—15%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—35.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 58.8 (#33)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemini 3 Flash Preview
GPQA Diamond—89.4%
SimpleQA Verified—66.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—13.5%
LMArena Expert—1462

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 45.5 (#16)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemini 3 Flash Preview
LMArena Vision—1285
GeoBench—88%
VPCT—72.6%
Blueprint-Bench 2—0%
LMArena Document—1413

Multilingual Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.1 (#92), Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 55.7 (#27)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemini 3 Flash Preview
LMArena Non-English14071458
LMArena Russian14361480
LMArena Chinese—1511
LMArena French—1477
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Japanese—1489
LMArena Korean—1443
LMArena Spanish—1469

Instruction Following Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.0 (#106), Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 75.7 (#56)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemini 3 Flash Preview
LMArena Instruction Following14041437

Long Context Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.4 (#97), Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 44.4 (#67)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemini 3 Flash Preview
LMArena Longer Query14211452

Writing & Preference Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.0 (#92), Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 65.5 (#45)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGemini 3 Flash Preview
LMArena Text14191466
LMArena Creative Writing14031457
LMArena Multi-Turn14111471

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better than Gemini 3 Flash Preview?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus costs 2.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3 Flash Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Gemini 3 Flash Preview?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is cheaper. It lists at $0.27 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens; Gemini 3 Flash Preview lists at $0.50 and $3.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Gemini 3 Flash Preview better for coding?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.9 versus 42.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Gemini 3 Flash Preview share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 59.

Related comparisons

Go deeper