Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has enough public results to be ranked (#242); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads 39.8 to 35.4.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderDeepSeekAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index39.732.6
Released2024-05-072024-11-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1014

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 39.8 (#141), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 35.4 (#211)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
LMArena Coding—1236
BigCodeBench Complete59.4%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 22.9 (#172)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts—1220
BIG-Bench Hard78.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index124.78—
HellaSwag87.1%—
PIQA83.9%—
WinoGrande86.3%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 13.3 (#297)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.4%
LMArena Math—1242
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.1 (#257)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond—46.3%
ARC (AI2) Challenge92.2%—
MMLU78.4%—
TriviaQA80%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 40.1 (#217)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English—1236
LMArena Chinese—1249
LMArena Russian—1246

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 65.0 (#222)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following—1233

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#217)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query—1224

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.8 (#218)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text—1256
LMArena Creative Writing—1231
LMArena Multi-Turn—1252

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has enough public results to be ranked (#242); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.8 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper