Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs Qwen1.5-72B

Qwen1.5-72B has enough public results to be ranked (#285); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Qwen1.5-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.8

Rank #285 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Qwen1.5-72B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads 40.4 to 31.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 59.4% for DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and 40.3% for Qwen1.5-72B.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Qwen1.5-72B specifications
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen1.5-72B
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index40.330.8
Released2024-05-072024-02-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1022

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 40.4 (#139), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen1.5-72B
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%33.2%
BigCodeBench Complete59.4%40.3%
LMArena Coding—1165
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—61.6%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts—1148
BIG-Bench Hard78.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index124.77—
HellaSwag87.1%—
PIQA83.9%—
WinoGrande86.3%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Math—1164

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen1.5-72B
GPQA Diamond—28.8%
LMArena Expert—1136
ARC (AI2) Challenge92.2%—
MMLU78.4%—
TriviaQA80%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Non-English—1135
LMArena Chinese—1186
LMArena French—1159
LMArena German—1084
LMArena Japanese—1061
LMArena Korean—1050
LMArena Russian—1104
LMArena Spanish—1110

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Instruction Following—1141

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Longer Query—1157

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Text—1166
LMArena Creative Writing—1137
LMArena Multi-Turn—1160

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Qwen1.5-72B has enough public results to be ranked (#285); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Qwen1.5-72B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper