Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#168); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct specifications
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index40.339.4
Released2024-05-07—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1016

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 40.4 (#139), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
LMArena Coding—1347
BigCodeBench Complete59.4%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts—1322
BIG-Bench Hard78.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index124.77—
HellaSwag87.1%—
PIQA83.9%—
WinoGrande86.3%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Math—1305

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Expert—1308
ARC (AI2) Challenge92.2%—
MMLU78.4%—
TriviaQA80%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1275
LMArena Chinese—1304
LMArena French—1328
LMArena German—1282
LMArena Korean—1206
LMArena Russian—1268
LMArena Spanish—1336

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1299

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1312

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Text—1311
LMArena Creative Writing—1264
LMArena Multi-Turn—1309

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#168); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.4 vs 39.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper