Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#248); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads 39.8 to 34.6.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index39.732.2
Released2024-05-07—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1016

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 39.8 (#141), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
LMArena Coding—1210
BigCodeBench Complete59.4%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts—1208
BIG-Bench Hard78.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index124.78—
HellaSwag87.1%—
PIQA83.9%—
WinoGrande86.3%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Omni-MATH—16.1%
LMArena Math—1208

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
ARC (AI2) Challenge92.2%—
MMLU78.4%—
TriviaQA80%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1160
LMArena Chinese—1192
LMArena Russian—1187

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
IFEval—78%
LMArena Instruction Following—1186

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1194

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text—1218
LMArena Creative Writing—1199
WildBench—73.4%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1221

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#248); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.8 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper