Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has enough public results to be ranked (#265); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads 39.8 to 29.3.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat specifications
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
ProviderDeepSeekNVIDIA
Noometry Index39.731.2
Released2024-05-07—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked109

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 39.8 (#141), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
LMArena Coding—1025
BigCodeBench Complete59.4%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts—1047
BIG-Bench Hard78.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index124.78—
HellaSwag87.1%—
PIQA83.9%—
WinoGrande86.3%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Math—1072

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
ARC (AI2) Challenge92.2%—
MMLU78.4%—
TriviaQA80%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Non-English—1064

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Instruction Following—1061

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Longer Query—998

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Text—1098
LMArena Creative Writing—1091
LMArena Multi-Turn—1058

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has enough public results to be ranked (#265); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.8 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper