Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs Llama 3-8B

Llama 3-8B has enough public results to be ranked (#344); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Llama 3-8B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads 40.4 to 31.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 59.4% for DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and 36.9% for Llama 3-8B.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Llama 3-8B specifications
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 3-8B
ProviderDeepSeekMeta
Noometry Index40.325.5
Released2024-05-072024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1034

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 40.4 (#139), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 3-8B
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%31.9%
BigCodeBench Complete59.4%36.9%
LMArena Coding—1152
HumanEval+—56.7%
MBPP+—54.8%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 3-8B
Epoch Capabilities Index124.77116.45
WinoGrande86.3%75.7%
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1133
DTBench—43.9%
Adversarial NLI—57.3%
BIG-Bench Hard78.8%—
ForecastBench—58.6
HellaSwag87.1%—
PIQA83.9%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 3-8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.9%
LMArena Math—1151
MATH Level 5—6.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 3-8B
ARC (AI2) Challenge92.2%82.8%
MMLU78.4%68.8%
TriviaQA80%67.7%
GPQA Diamond—26.1%
LMArena Expert—1113
OpenBookQA—82.6%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 3-8B
LMArena Non-English—1098
LMArena Chinese—1076
LMArena French—1159
LMArena German—1104
LMArena Japanese—967
LMArena Korean—1004
LMArena Russian—1109
LMArena Spanish—1173

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 3-8B
LMArena Instruction Following—1127

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 3-8B
LMArena Longer Query—1128

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 3-8B
LMArena Text—1166
LMArena Creative Writing—1150
LMArena Multi-Turn—1152

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better than Llama 3-8B?

Llama 3-8B has enough public results to be ranked (#344); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Llama 3-8B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper