Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs Llama 2-7B

Llama 2-7B has enough public results to be ranked (#317); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-7B Meta

29.1

Rank #317 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Llama 2-7B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads 40.4 to 29.2.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Llama 2-7B specifications
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-7B
ProviderDeepSeekMeta
Noometry Index40.329.1
Released2024-05-072023-07-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1029

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 40.4 (#139), Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-7B
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
LMArena Coding—1002
BigCodeBench Complete59.4%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-7B
BIG-Bench Hard78.8%39.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index124.7799.06
HellaSwag87.1%77.2%
PIQA83.9%78.8%
WinoGrande86.3%69.2%
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1009
LAMBADA—73.3%

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-7B
LMArena Math—1042
GSM8K—16.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-7B
ARC (AI2) Challenge92.2%45.9%
MMLU78.4%45.8%
TriviaQA80%73.7%
LMArena Expert—1036
BoolQ—77.9%
OpenBookQA—58.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-7B
ScienceQA—43.1%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-7B
LMArena Non-English—973
LMArena Chinese—973
LMArena French—970
LMArena German—978
LMArena Russian—995
LMArena Spanish—1007

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-7B
LMArena Instruction Following—1006

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-7B
LMArena Longer Query—999

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-7B
LMArena Text—1053
LMArena Creative Writing—1033
LMArena Multi-Turn—1029

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better than Llama 2-7B?

Llama 2-7B has enough public results to be ranked (#317); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) or Llama 2-7B better for coding?

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Llama 2-7B share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper