Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs Llama 2-70B

Llama 2-70B has enough public results to be ranked (#349); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-70B Meta

24.4

Rank #349 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Llama 2-70B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads 40.4 to 31.4.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Llama 2-70B specifications
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-70B
ProviderDeepSeekMeta
Noometry Index40.324.4
Released2024-05-072023-07-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1035

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 40.4 (#139), Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-70B
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
LMArena Coding—1079
BigCodeBench Complete59.4%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-70B
BIG-Bench Hard78.8%64.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index124.77113.79
HellaSwag87.1%85.3%
PIQA83.9%82.8%
WinoGrande86.3%80.2%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1073
DTBench—41.6%
CommonsenseQA 2.0—50%
ForecastBench—51.4
LAMBADA—78.9%

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—0%
LMArena Math—1091
MATH Level 5—3.3%
GSM8K—69.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-70B
ARC (AI2) Challenge92.2%78.3%
MMLU78.4%69.9%
TriviaQA80%87.6%
GPQA Diamond—26.3%
LMArena Expert—1039
BoolQ—88.6%
OpenBookQA—60.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-70B
LMArena Non-English—1045
LMArena Chinese—995
LMArena French—1090
LMArena German—1041
LMArena Japanese—927
LMArena Korean—964
LMArena Russian—1083
LMArena Spanish—1143

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-70B
LMArena Instruction Following—1071

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-70B
LMArena Longer Query—1062

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-70B
LMArena Text—1115
LMArena Creative Writing—1075
LMArena Multi-Turn—1088

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better than Llama 2-70B?

Llama 2-70B has enough public results to be ranked (#349); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) or Llama 2-70B better for coding?

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Llama 2-70B share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper