Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs Llama 2-13B

Llama 2-13B has enough public results to be ranked (#309); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-13B Meta

29.6

Rank #309 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads 40.4 to 30.9.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Llama 2-13B specifications
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-13B
ProviderDeepSeekMeta
Noometry Index40.329.6
Released2024-05-072023-07-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1032

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 40.4 (#139), Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-13B
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
LMArena Coding—1062
BigCodeBench Complete59.4%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-13B
BIG-Bench Hard78.8%58.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index124.77106.17
HellaSwag87.1%80.7%
PIQA83.9%80.8%
WinoGrande86.3%72.8%
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1051
DTBench—42.2%
LAMBADA—76.5%

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-13B
LMArena Math—1065
GSM8K—36.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-13B
ARC (AI2) Challenge92.2%60.3%
MMLU78.4%55.6%
TriviaQA80%79.6%
LMArena Expert—1030
BoolQ—82.4%
OpenBookQA—57%

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-13B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-13B
ScienceQA—55.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-13B
LMArena Non-English—1024
LMArena Chinese—1001
LMArena French—1044
LMArena German—1009
LMArena Japanese—894
LMArena Korean—953
LMArena Russian—1055
LMArena Spanish—1087

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-13B
LMArena Instruction Following—1045

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-13B
LMArena Longer Query—1064

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Llama 2-13B
LMArena Text—1084
LMArena Creative Writing—1047
LMArena Multi-Turn—1050

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better than Llama 2-13B?

Llama 2-13B has enough public results to be ranked (#309); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Llama 2-13B share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper