Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has enough public results to be ranked (#163); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

Summary

  • DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 specifications
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Hunyuan Turbo 0110
ProviderDeepSeekTencent
Noometry Index40.339.6
Released2024-05-07—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1011

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 40.4 (#139), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Hunyuan Turbo 0110
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
LMArena Coding—1319
BigCodeBench Complete59.4%—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Hard Prompts—1308
BIG-Bench Hard78.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index124.77—
HellaSwag87.1%—
PIQA83.9%—
WinoGrande86.3%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Math—1273

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Hunyuan Turbo 0110
ARC (AI2) Challenge92.2%—
MMLU78.4%—
TriviaQA80%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Non-English—1285
LMArena Chinese—1358
LMArena Russian—1305

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Instruction Following—1278

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Longer Query—1309

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Text—1311
LMArena Creative Writing—1269
LMArena Multi-Turn—1303

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has enough public results to be ranked (#163); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper