Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs Gemma 1.1 7b IT

Gemma 1.1 7b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#277); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 7b IT Google

31.3

Rank #277 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads 40.4 to 31.5.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Gemma 1.1 7b IT specifications
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemma 1.1 7b IT
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Noometry Index40.331.3
Released2024-05-07—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1019

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 40.4 (#139), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemma 1.1 7b IT
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
LMArena Coding—1084
BigCodeBench Complete59.4%—
HumanEval+—35.4%
MBPP+—45%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts—1071
BIG-Bench Hard78.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index124.77—
HellaSwag87.1%—
PIQA83.9%—
WinoGrande86.3%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Math—1107

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Expert—1039
ARC (AI2) Challenge92.2%—
MMLU78.4%—
TriviaQA80%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Non-English—1052
LMArena Chinese—1061
LMArena French—1065
LMArena German—1054
LMArena Japanese—971
LMArena Korean—988
LMArena Russian—1046
LMArena Spanish—1049

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Instruction Following—1057

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Longer Query—1056

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Text—1094
LMArena Creative Writing—1060
LMArena Multi-Turn—1040

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better than Gemma 1.1 7b IT?

Gemma 1.1 7b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#277); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) or Gemma 1.1 7b IT better for coding?

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Gemma 1.1 7b IT share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper