Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has enough public results to be ranked (#228); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads 40.4 to 28.4.
  • DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) specifications
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Noometry Index40.335.1
Released2024-05-072024-12-06
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1054

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 40.4 (#139), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%45.9%
BigCodeBench Complete59.4%59.9%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—13.5%
Aider Polyglot—38.2%
WeirdML—25.8%
LiveBench Coding—63.4%
LMArena Coding—1350
CadEval—30%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
TheAgentCompany—11.4%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
Epoch Capabilities Index124.77135.36
ARC-AGI-2—1.3%
SimpleBench—31.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—37.8%
EnigmaEval—1.1%
LiveBench Reasoning—78.2%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1346
DTBench—63.2%
LiveBench Data Analysis—69.4%
BIG-Bench Hard78.8%—
HellaSwag87.1%—
LiveBench—66.9%
PIQA83.9%—
WinoGrande86.3%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—57.8%
Omni-MATH—45.9%
LiveBench Math—75.8%
LMArena Math—1352
MATH Level 5—82.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
MMLU78.4%79.7%
GPQA Diamond—64.1%
Humanity's Last Exam—6.6%
MMLU-Pro—73.7%
Confabulations—12.4%
GPQA (HELM)—55.6%
LMArena Expert—1339
ARC (AI2) Challenge92.2%—
TriviaQA80%—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
LMArena Vision—1158
GeoBench—77%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
LMArena Non-English—1342
LMArena Chinese—1373
LMArena French—1391
LMArena German—1353
LMArena Japanese—1294
LMArena Korean—1313
LMArena Russian—1351
LMArena Spanish—1363

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
LiveBench Instruction Following—85.8%
IFEval—84.1%
LMArena Instruction Following—1336

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
Fiction.LiveBench—61.1%
LMArena Longer Query—1344

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
LMArena Text—1354
LMArena Creative Writing—1340
Short-Story Creative Writing—73.8%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1128
WildBench—80%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1350
LiveBench Language—51.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better than Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has enough public results to be ranked (#228); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) or Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better for coding?

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54.

Related comparisons

Go deeper