Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs Gemini 1.0 Pro

Gemini 1.0 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#332); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads 40.4 to 32.2.
  • DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Gemini 1.0 Pro specifications
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 1.0 Pro
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Noometry Index40.327.3
Released2024-05-072023-12-13
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1024

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 40.4 (#139), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 1.0 Pro
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
LMArena Coding—1108
BigCodeBench Complete59.4%—
HumanEval+—55.5%
MBPP+—61.4%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 1.0 Pro
Epoch Capabilities Index124.77117.04
LMArena Hard Prompts—1109
DTBench—45.9%
BIG-Bench Hard78.8%—
HellaSwag87.1%—
PIQA83.9%—
WinoGrande86.3%—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 1.0 Pro
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.1%
LMArena Math—1132
MATH Level 5—11.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 1.0 Pro
MMLU78.4%70%
GPQA Diamond—34%
LMArena Expert—1059
ARC (AI2) Challenge92.2%—
TriviaQA80%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 1.0 Pro
LMArena Non-English—1138
LMArena Chinese—1124
LMArena French—1145
LMArena German—1125
LMArena Japanese—1023
LMArena Russian—1186
LMArena Spanish—1119

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 1.0 Pro
LMArena Instruction Following—1114

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 1.0 Pro
LMArena Longer Query—1132

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)Gemini 1.0 Pro
LMArena Text—1149
LMArena Creative Writing—1131
LMArena Multi-Turn—1139

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?

Gemini 1.0 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#332); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper