Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs Wizardlm 70b

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.6

Rank #200 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads 49.8 to 34.8.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Wizardlm 70b specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Wizardlm 70b
ProviderDeepSeekMicrosoft
Noometry Index37.633.0
Released2024-09-06—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.7 (#281), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding13091081
Aider Polyglot17.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 25.6 (#145), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts12891079

Math DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 35.9 (#177), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Math12881116

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.8 (#193), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Expert1266—

Multilingual DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.5 (#193), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English12731078
LMArena Chinese13181052
LMArena German12581083
LMArena Russian12891155
LMArena French1289—
LMArena Japanese1228—
LMArena Korean1209—
LMArena Spanish1248—

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.5 (#194), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following12801093

Long Context DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#174), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query13011097

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 49.8 (#187), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Text12941120
LMArena Creative Writing12851149
LMArena Multi-Turn12971108

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than Wizardlm 70b?

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (31.7 vs 31.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper