Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs Qwen3.5 Plus

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.6

Rank #200 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.9

Rank #106 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 35.9.
  • DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Qwen3.5 Plus specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3.5 Plus
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.642.9
Released2024-09-062026-02-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2.40
Results tracked2215

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.7 (#281), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3.5 Plus
Aider Polyglot17.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
LMArena Coding1309—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
ALE-Bench—621.92
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3.5 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—0.54

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 25.6 (#145), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3.5 Plus
Chess Puzzles—22%
LMArena Hard Prompts1289—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—80.5%
LMCA—36.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.78

Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 35.9 (#177), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3.5 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1288—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.8 (#193), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3.5 Plus
GPQA Diamond—84.8%
SimpleQA Verified—25.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.7%
LMArena Expert1266—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.5 (#193), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Non-English1273—
LMArena Chinese1318—
LMArena French1289—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1228—
LMArena Korean1209—
LMArena Russian1289—
LMArena Spanish1248—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.5 (#194), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1280—

Long Context Qwen3.5 Plus leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#174), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3.5 Plus
CL-bench—19.8%
CL-bench Life—12.4%
LMArena Longer Query1301—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 49.8 (#187), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Text1294—
LMArena Creative Writing1285—
LMArena Multi-Turn1297—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper