Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs Qwen3-30B-A3B

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.0

Rank #197 Confirmed

Qwen3-30B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.5

Rank #174 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3-30B-A3B in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads 39.5 to 31.0.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Qwen3-30B-A3B specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-30B-A3B
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.038.5
Released2024-09-062025-04-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—41K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.12
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked2232

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.3 (#274), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.0 (#188)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Coding13101416
Aider Polyglot17.8%—
SciCode—33.3%
WeirdML—29.8%
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.5 (#75)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-30B-A3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41.4%

Reasoning DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 24.5 (#145), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 21.6 (#193)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts12891398
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—8%
DTBench—69.3%
LMCA—22.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—139.63

Math Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 33.3 (#177), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 36.0 (#133)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Math12891394
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—47.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—70.3%

Knowledge Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.2 (#190), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.7 (#96)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Expert12661395
GPQA Diamond—70.1%
Confabulations—12.3%

Multilingual Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.7 (#188), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.8 (#126)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Non-English12731372
LMArena Chinese13171434
LMArena French12881419
LMArena German12581379
LMArena Japanese12281338
LMArena Korean12091333
LMArena Russian12891369
LMArena Spanish12481403

Instruction Following Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.7 (#189), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.2 (#137)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following12801364

Long Context DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#169), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#278)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query13011379
Fiction.LiveBench—40.6%

Writing & Preference Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 50.0 (#182), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.9 (#138)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Text12941384
LMArena Creative Writing12851318
LMArena Multi-Turn12971378
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) or Qwen3-30B-A3B better for coding?

Qwen3-30B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper