Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.0

Rank #197 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads 24.5 to 20.0.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.029.4
Released2024-09-062024-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.80
Output $ / M tokens—$8.40
Results tracked226

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.3 (#274), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Aider Polyglot17.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
LMArena Coding1310—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.4 (#136)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
OSWorld—5%

Reasoning DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 24.5 (#145), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.0 (#228)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark—36%
LMArena Hard Prompts1289—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 33.3 (#177), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Math1289—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.2 (#190), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Expert1266—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 32.9 (#92)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Vision—1107
Video-MME—73.5%
GeoBench—62%
SpatialViz-Bench—33.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.7 (#188), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1273—
LMArena Chinese1317—
LMArena French1288—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1228—
LMArena Korean1209—
LMArena Russian1289—
LMArena Spanish1248—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.7 (#189), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1280—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#169), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1301—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 50.0 (#182), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Text1294—
LMArena Creative Writing1285—
LMArena Multi-Turn1297—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper