Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs MiniMax M1

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.6

Rank #200 Confirmed

MiniMax M1 MiniMax

40.3

Rank #150 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax M1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax M1 leads 39.9 to 31.7.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and MiniMax M1 specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax M1
ProviderDeepSeekMiniMax
Noometry Index37.640.3
Released2024-09-062025-06-13
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—40K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.55
Output $ / M tokens—$2.20
Results tracked2218

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax M1 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.7 (#281), MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax M1
LMArena Coding13091359
Aider Polyglot17.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 25.6 (#145), MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax M1
LMArena Hard Prompts12891339

Math MiniMax M1 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 35.9 (#177), MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax M1
LMArena Math12881361

Knowledge MiniMax M1 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.8 (#193), MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax M1
LMArena Expert12661317

Multilingual MiniMax M1 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.5 (#193), MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax M1
LMArena Non-English12731319
LMArena Chinese13181360
LMArena French12891370
LMArena German12581350
LMArena Japanese12281217
LMArena Korean12091266
LMArena Russian12891329
LMArena Spanish12481353

Instruction Following MiniMax M1 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.5 (#194), MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax M1
LMArena Instruction Following12801312

Long Context MiniMax M1 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#174), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax M1
LMArena Longer Query13011326
Fiction.LiveBench—69.4%

Writing & Preference MiniMax M1 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 49.8 (#187), MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)MiniMax M1
LMArena Text12941343
LMArena Creative Writing12851298
LMArena Multi-Turn12971335

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and MiniMax M1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper