Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs Magistral Small

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.6

Rank #200 Confirmed

Magistral Small Mistral AI

30.2

Rank #296 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads 25.6 to 6.8.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Magistral Small specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Magistral Small
ProviderDeepSeekMistral AI
Noometry Index37.630.2
Released2024-09-062025-06-10
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—40K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$1.50
Results tracked2210

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Magistral Small leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.7 (#281), Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Magistral Small
Aider Polyglot17.8%—
SciCode—35.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
LMArena Coding1309—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 25.6 (#145), Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Magistral Small
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—6.3%
ARC-AGI-1—5%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1289—
DTBench—61.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—133.19

Math DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 35.9 (#177), Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Magistral Small
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—30%
LMArena Math1288—

Knowledge DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.8 (#193), Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Magistral Small
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
LMArena Expert1266—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.5 (#193), Magistral Small: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Magistral Small
LMArena Non-English1273—
LMArena Chinese1318—
LMArena French1289—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1228—
LMArena Korean1209—
LMArena Russian1289—
LMArena Spanish1248—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.5 (#194), Magistral Small: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Magistral Small
LMArena Instruction Following1280—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#174), Magistral Small: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Magistral Small
LMArena Longer Query1301—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 49.8 (#187), Magistral Small: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Magistral Small
LMArena Text1294—
LMArena Creative Writing1285—
LMArena Multi-Turn1297—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than Magistral Small?

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) or Magistral Small better for coding?

Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Magistral Small share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper