Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs Llama 3-8B

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.6

Rank #200 Confirmed

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3-8B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads 35.9 to 8.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 48.6% for DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and 31.9% for Llama 3-8B.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Llama 3-8B specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Llama 3-8B
ProviderDeepSeekMeta
Noometry Index37.625.5
Released2024-09-062024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2234

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.7 (#281), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Llama 3-8B
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%31.9%
LMArena Coding13091152
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%36.9%
HumanEval+83.5%56.7%
MBPP+74.1%54.8%
Aider Polyglot17.8%—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 25.6 (#145), Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Llama 3-8B
LMArena Hard Prompts12891133
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—43.9%
Adversarial NLI—57.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—116.45
ForecastBench—58.6
WinoGrande—75.7%

Math DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 35.9 (#177), Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Llama 3-8B
LMArena Math12881151
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.9%
MATH Level 5—6.1%

Knowledge DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.8 (#193), Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Llama 3-8B
LMArena Expert12661113
GPQA Diamond—26.1%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—82.8%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—82.6%
TriviaQA—67.7%

Multilingual DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.5 (#193), Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Llama 3-8B
LMArena Non-English12731098
LMArena Chinese13181076
LMArena French12891159
LMArena German12581104
LMArena Japanese1228967
LMArena Korean12091004
LMArena Russian12891109
LMArena Spanish12481173

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.5 (#194), Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Llama 3-8B
LMArena Instruction Following12801127

Long Context DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#174), Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Llama 3-8B
LMArena Longer Query13011128

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 49.8 (#187), Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Llama 3-8B
LMArena Text12941166
LMArena Creative Writing12851150
LMArena Multi-Turn12971152

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than Llama 3-8B?

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (31.7 vs 31.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Llama 3-8B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper