Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.6

Rank #200 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 40.0 to 31.7.
  • DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderDeepSeekTencent
Noometry Index37.641.3
Released2024-09-06—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2216

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.7 (#281), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Coding13091361
Aider Polyglot17.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 25.6 (#145), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Hard Prompts12891374

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 35.9 (#177), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Math12881359

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.8 (#193), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Expert12661339

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.5 (#193), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English12731363
LMArena Chinese13181417
LMArena French12891391
LMArena German12581355
LMArena Japanese12281342
LMArena Korean12091351
LMArena Russian12891368
LMArena Spanish1248—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.5 (#194), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following12801344

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#174), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query13011366

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 49.8 (#187), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text12941377
LMArena Creative Writing12851359
LMArena Multi-Turn12971387

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper