Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.6

Rank #200 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) scores higher in 2 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 5 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 38.6 to 31.7.
  • DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Hunyuan Turbo 0110
ProviderDeepSeekTencent
Noometry Index37.639.6
Released2024-09-06—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2211

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.7 (#281), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Coding13091319
Aider Polyglot17.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Reasoning Too close to call

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 25.6 (#145), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Hard Prompts12891308

Math Too close to call

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 35.9 (#177), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Math12881273

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.8 (#193), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Expert1266—

Multilingual Too close to call

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.5 (#193), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Non-English12731285
LMArena Chinese13181358
LMArena Russian12891305
LMArena French1289—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1228—
LMArena Korean1209—
LMArena Spanish1248—

Instruction Following Too close to call

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.5 (#194), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Instruction Following12801278

Long Context Too close to call

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#174), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Longer Query13011309

Writing & Preference Too close to call

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 49.8 (#187), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Text12941311
LMArena Creative Writing12851269
LMArena Multi-Turn12971303

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper