Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs Gemma 3 12B

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.6

Rank #200 Confirmed

Gemma 3 12B Google

32.1

Rank #262 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) scores higher in 4 categories and Gemma 3 12B in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads 35.9 to 22.3.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Gemma 3 12B specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemma 3 12B
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Noometry Index37.632.1
Released2024-09-062025-03-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.15
Results tracked2224

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.7 (#281), Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemma 3 12B
LMArena Coding13091281
Aider Polyglot17.8%—
SciCode—17.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): —, Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemma 3 12B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—30.4%

Reasoning DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 25.6 (#145), Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemma 3 12B
LMArena Hard Prompts12891309
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—48.8%
LMCA—4.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—123.5

Math DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 35.9 (#177), Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemma 3 12B
LMArena Math12881307
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—16.7%

Knowledge DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.8 (#193), Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemma 3 12B
LMArena Expert12661248
GPQA Diamond—39.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.4%

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): —, Gemma 3 12B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemma 3 12B
MindCube—46.7%

Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.5 (#193), Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemma 3 12B
LMArena Non-English12731318
LMArena German12581370
LMArena Russian12891335
LMArena Chinese1318—
LMArena French1289—
LMArena Japanese1228—
LMArena Korean1209—
LMArena Spanish1248—

Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.5 (#194), Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemma 3 12B
LMArena Instruction Following12801299

Long Context Too close to call

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#174), Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemma 3 12B
LMArena Longer Query13011317

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 49.8 (#187), Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemma 3 12B
LMArena Text12941334
LMArena Creative Writing12851331
LMArena Multi-Turn12971334
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1126

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than Gemma 3 12B?

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) or Gemma 3 12B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (31.7 vs 31.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Gemma 3 12B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 12B has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper