Model comparison

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B DeepSeek

35.5

Rank #226 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 5 Preview leads 40.0 to 18.2.
  • DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B and Step 5 Preview specifications
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BStep 5 Preview
ProviderDeepSeekStepFun
Noometry Index35.547.9
Released2025-01-202026-09-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.02M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$2.70
Results tracked1418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 36.1 (#212), Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BStep 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev—1564
SciCode—58.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct43.9%—
LiveBench Coding33.7%—
LMArena Coding—1480
BigCodeBench Complete54.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 28.1 (#94), Step 5 Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BStep 5 Preview
BALROG19.5%—

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 18.2 (#284), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BStep 5 Preview
CritPt—20.9%
Chess Puzzles1%—
LiveBench Reasoning52.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1465
LiveBench Data Analysis45.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index137.44—
LiveBench45.5%—

Math Step 5 Preview leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 34.5 (#194), Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BStep 5 Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%—
ProofBench—42%
LiveBench Math59.4%—
LMArena Math—1470

Knowledge Step 5 Preview leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 35.7 (#182), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BStep 5 Preview
GPQA Diamond64.1%—
LMArena Expert—1470

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: —, Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision—1267

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: —, Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English—1432
LMArena Chinese—1519
LMArena Russian—1436
LMArena Spanish—1439

Instruction Following Step 5 Preview leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 61.6 (#243), Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BStep 5 Preview
LiveBench Instruction Following55.7%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1444

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: —, Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Step 5 Preview leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B: 49.6 (#188), Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text—1442
LMArena Creative Writing—1410
LMArena Multi-Turn—1447
LiveBench Language26.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.8 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B and Step 5 Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B has 14 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper