Model comparison

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B vs Olmo 7b Instruct

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads 49.0 to 25.8.

Side by side

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BOlmo 7b Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index37.830.3
Released2025-01-20—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1310

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 36.8 (#202), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BOlmo 7b Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct35.3%—
LiveBench Coding51.6%—
LMArena Coding—1016
BigCodeBench Complete49.9%—

Reasoning DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 24.9 (#156), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BOlmo 7b Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.3%—
LiveBench Reasoning67.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—993
LiveBench Data Analysis55.9%—
LiveBench54.5%—

Math DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 36.0 (#176), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BOlmo 7b Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202551.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—
LMArena Math—1018
MATH Level 589.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 30.7 (#225), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BOlmo 7b Instruct
GPQA Diamond55.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: —, Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English—977
LMArena Chinese—1014
LMArena Russian—947

Instruction Following DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 68.2 (#190), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BOlmo 7b Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following69.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following—978

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 49.0 (#194), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text—1032
LMArena Creative Writing—990
LMArena Multi-Turn—1007
LiveBench Language23.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper