Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Yi-Large
DeepSeek LLM 67B has enough public results to be ranked (#347); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Yi-Large leads 36.7 to 31.9.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Yi-Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Yi-Large leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Yi-Large: 36.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 47.2% |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1108 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Yi-Large: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Yi-Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Yi-Large?
DeepSeek LLM 67B has enough public results to be ranked (#347); Yi-Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Yi-Large better for coding?
Yi-Large scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Yi-Large share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Large has 3.