Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs StarCoder 2 7B
DeepSeek LLM 67B has enough public results to be ranked (#347); StarCoder 2 7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and StarCoder 2 7B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | StarCoder 2 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 37.0 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | 2024-02-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding StarCoder 2 7B leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), StarCoder 2 7B: 34.8
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 27.7% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 29.9% |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | 93.56 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 57.1% |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1108 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 32.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 38.7% |
| MMLU | — | 38.8% |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than StarCoder 2 7B?
DeepSeek LLM 67B has enough public results to be ranked (#347); StarCoder 2 7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or StarCoder 2 7B better for coding?
StarCoder 2 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.8 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and StarCoder 2 7B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 7B has 7.