Noometry

Model comparison

DeepSeek LLM 67B vs StarCoder 2 15B

DeepSeek LLM 67B has enough public results to be ranked (#341); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.8

Rank #341 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 15B NVIDIA

37.5

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and StarCoder 2 15B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where StarCoder 2 15B leads 36.0 to 31.3.

Side by side

DeepSeek LLM 67BStarCoder 2 15B
ProviderDeepSeekNVIDIA
Noometry Index24.837.5
Released2023-11-292024-02-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked157

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding StarCoder 2 15B leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273), StarCoder 2 15B: 36.0

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Coding1096—
BigCodeBench Complete—38.4%
HumanEval+—37.8%

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300), StarCoder 2 15B: —

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BStarCoder 2 15B
Epoch Capabilities Index110.54104.61
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1070—
WinoGrande—64.3%

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318), StarCoder 2 15B: —

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BStarCoder 2 15B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.8%—
LMArena Math1108—
MATH Level 56.4%—
GSM8K—57.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308), StarCoder 2 15B: —

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BStarCoder 2 15B
GPQA Diamond24.6%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—47.2%
MMLU—64.1%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262), StarCoder 2 15B: —

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Non-English1073—
LMArena Chinese1132—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272), StarCoder 2 15B: —

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Instruction Following1079—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260), StarCoder 2 15B: —

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Longer Query1092—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277), StarCoder 2 15B: —

BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BStarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Text1105—
LMArena Creative Writing1067—
LMArena Multi-Turn1082—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than StarCoder 2 15B?

DeepSeek LLM 67B has enough public results to be ranked (#341); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or StarCoder 2 15B better for coding?

StarCoder 2 15B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and StarCoder 2 15B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 15B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper